Rome's website had this to say:
"Should we really accept them as a snowboard or skate company just because they can spend a ton of cash on some of the best, most iconic riders? Does the ability to cut a big check magically turn a pair of figure skates into a pair of snowboard boots?
Should snowboarders lie down and accept it when the mainstream tries to reduce snowboarding to just some other generic form of “athleticism”?
If you think the same logo that’s on that nut-hugger swim suit, golf ball, tennis skirt, jump rope, baseball bat and Rollerblade might as well be on your next pair of snowboard boots, what will snowboarding look like in five or ten years? Will it be influenced in a way that’s true to our history?
Does any of this matter?Does snowboarding even matter?That’s up to you.
Wow. Let us know what you think!
2 comments:
sick boot.
Who care's about the politics of Big versus Small companies. If the product is good, it's going to sell. And Rome, my friends, make damn good products with style to spare. I just got these and the only reason I didn't buy them sooner was because I was hesitant to purchase traditional lacing. However, I just got word from Rome that they'll be doing more Boa lacing in next year's models so that's something to look forward to. I actually wish they would've picked a higher end boot to throw it on but I can also understand why they would put it on their softest park boot.
Post a Comment